<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science of Getting Rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Jafo,

I appreciate you sharing your opinion about &#039;The Science of Getting Rich&#039; as well as the Law of Attraction.

As with everything, each person will have their own views, and what empowers one person will not have the same effect for others.

It&#039;s all about what each individual gets out of any given set of information, and there are no hard and fast &quot;this is good or this is bad&quot; rules.

James Arthur Ray says that we should surround ourselves with things that strengthen us and stay away from things that weaken us.

So, if something doesn&#039;t give a person strength, inspiration, or empowerment, then no amount of other people saying that information is &quot;good&quot; will make a difference.

It&#039;s all up to the individual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jafo,</p>
<p>I appreciate you sharing your opinion about &#8216;The Science of Getting Rich&#8217; as well as the Law of Attraction.</p>
<p>As with everything, each person will have their own views, and what empowers one person will not have the same effect for others.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about what each individual gets out of any given set of information, and there are no hard and fast &#8220;this is good or this is bad&#8221; rules.</p>
<p>James Arthur Ray says that we should surround ourselves with things that strengthen us and stay away from things that weaken us.</p>
<p>So, if something doesn&#8217;t give a person strength, inspiration, or empowerment, then no amount of other people saying that information is &#8220;good&#8221; will make a difference.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all up to the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafo</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>jafo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thing is &quot;The Science Of Getting Rich&quot; book is not about science at all but religion - it doesn&#039;t really matter what label the author or anyone else put on it. And there is this religious community revolving around the book. And like any other group of people there are those taking advantage of others, and you usually find those at the very top. But it&#039;s not easy to reason with people about their (religious) beliefs. As the Golden Rule is found in most religions, so are different strategies to work around it. In this case it boils down to the Law Of Attraction, which isn&#039;t a scientific law btw. There are different ideas about this, but the one being popularly held in the community is that everything that happens to any person, whatever comes into that persons life, s/he attracted in the first place - no exceptions. To put it rough, you can gladly engage in any business that will ultimately harm people, all you have to do is not do any research or ask any questions. Whatever happens to people in the long run as effects of your actions, they asked for it! There are no no victims in this world according to this standpoint. Well of course you can&#039;t do so with intent - but the key here is to not emphasize or focus on anything bad that could happen. Do you see where all of this is going? This isn&#039;t something that can be easily brushed off with some slick comments, because behind all these fluffy clouds there&#039;s still this rotten smell. And hopefully people will avoid it instinctively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is &#8220;The Science Of Getting Rich&#8221; book is not about science at all but religion &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t really matter what label the author or anyone else put on it. And there is this religious community revolving around the book. And like any other group of people there are those taking advantage of others, and you usually find those at the very top. But it&#8217;s not easy to reason with people about their (religious) beliefs. As the Golden Rule is found in most religions, so are different strategies to work around it. In this case it boils down to the Law Of Attraction, which isn&#8217;t a scientific law btw. There are different ideas about this, but the one being popularly held in the community is that everything that happens to any person, whatever comes into that persons life, s/he attracted in the first place &#8211; no exceptions. To put it rough, you can gladly engage in any business that will ultimately harm people, all you have to do is not do any research or ask any questions. Whatever happens to people in the long run as effects of your actions, they asked for it! There are no no victims in this world according to this standpoint. Well of course you can&#8217;t do so with intent &#8211; but the key here is to not emphasize or focus on anything bad that could happen. Do you see where all of this is going? This isn&#8217;t something that can be easily brushed off with some slick comments, because behind all these fluffy clouds there&#8217;s still this rotten smell. And hopefully people will avoid it instinctively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some discussion on The Secret at livingthesecret.tv</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Some discussion on The Secret at livingthesecret.tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] As I write this I am having a discussion with Aaron over at http://www.todayisthatday.com/blog/the-science-of-getting-rich/&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I write this I am having a discussion with Aaron over at <a href="http://www.todayisthatday.com/blog/the-science-of-getting-rich/&#038;nbsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.todayisthatday.com/blog/the-science-of-getting-rich/&#038;nbsp</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Evatt</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Evatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron,
I am not familiar with the debate pertaining to the LOA. Perhaps it&#039;s not something that&#039;s topical amongst the various circles of people I know here in New Zealand.

After watching The Secret perhaps 6 or 7 times (necessary as I am writing an eBook related to it), I saw very little in there that took the viewer beyond a rather limited material based approach to reality.

I agree the money and physical &quot;stuff&quot; is tangible to the majority of people. I agree that it is measurable. What I have found, however, is that I live in a highly intelligent universe, and that this highly intelligent universe is more than capable of taking care of my tangible/material/measurable necessities for physical survival and enjoyment -- with very little conscious effort on my part.

In the ancient Hawaiian Huna tradition there is there is the prinicple that &quot;as a divine being we have only ONE need. That is the need of a mirror&quot;. (This follows on from the principle that &quot;we are first and foremost Divine Beings&quot;). The reality we construct and perceive within consciousness (our life here in Earth), is that mirror.

I have found, in working with myself and other people, that the key is in &quot;decoding&quot; the nature of what it is I am ALREADY attraction into my experience and hence mirroring to myself. There is a way of approaching my experience which results in every experience leading to an increase of Power (authentic Power). At a tangible/measurable level ONE (a fairly insignificant one) con-sequence of increasing Power and Awareness is greater and greater effortlessness with regards to financial sufficiency.

I do not personally judge there to be anything &quot;wrong&quot; or erroneous with the approach the makers of The Secret took in illustrating the Law Of Attraction. Rather, I simply feel that in my experience it was a relatively limited and potentially distorted approach when not put into the greater context through which things like the LOA are naturally and spontaneously revealed to a human being as he/she awakens to reality and his/her true nature.

I suspect the movie took the limited approach that it did either through ignorance on the part of the producers (questionable, but possible), or because they knew this is what would sell (especially in America and any other culture subscribing to the &quot;American Dream&quot;). The majority of people are not primarily concerning themselves with consciously waking up to their true nature. They are, however, deeply engrossed in the money-driven/orrientated mindset and &quot;I am insufficient as I am&quot; mindset that has been carefully impregnated into the human story for the last 400-600+ years by a tiny collective of people who presently reap the most benefit from a world that buys into these mindsets (i.e. the small handful of people who effectively own/possess/control a vast majority of the material wealth in this human world), at the expense of nearly every other nation/human being carrying interest bearing debt.

Stumbling around in the ridiculous seems to be human speciality. Of course, it&#039;s all part of what helps Awareness evolve through the human experience.

With love,
Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,<br />
I am not familiar with the debate pertaining to the LOA. Perhaps it&#8217;s not something that&#8217;s topical amongst the various circles of people I know here in New Zealand.</p>
<p>After watching The Secret perhaps 6 or 7 times (necessary as I am writing an eBook related to it), I saw very little in there that took the viewer beyond a rather limited material based approach to reality.</p>
<p>I agree the money and physical &#8220;stuff&#8221; is tangible to the majority of people. I agree that it is measurable. What I have found, however, is that I live in a highly intelligent universe, and that this highly intelligent universe is more than capable of taking care of my tangible/material/measurable necessities for physical survival and enjoyment &#8212; with very little conscious effort on my part.</p>
<p>In the ancient Hawaiian Huna tradition there is there is the prinicple that &#8220;as a divine being we have only ONE need. That is the need of a mirror&#8221;. (This follows on from the principle that &#8220;we are first and foremost Divine Beings&#8221;). The reality we construct and perceive within consciousness (our life here in Earth), is that mirror.</p>
<p>I have found, in working with myself and other people, that the key is in &#8220;decoding&#8221; the nature of what it is I am ALREADY attraction into my experience and hence mirroring to myself. There is a way of approaching my experience which results in every experience leading to an increase of Power (authentic Power). At a tangible/measurable level ONE (a fairly insignificant one) con-sequence of increasing Power and Awareness is greater and greater effortlessness with regards to financial sufficiency.</p>
<p>I do not personally judge there to be anything &#8220;wrong&#8221; or erroneous with the approach the makers of The Secret took in illustrating the Law Of Attraction. Rather, I simply feel that in my experience it was a relatively limited and potentially distorted approach when not put into the greater context through which things like the LOA are naturally and spontaneously revealed to a human being as he/she awakens to reality and his/her true nature.</p>
<p>I suspect the movie took the limited approach that it did either through ignorance on the part of the producers (questionable, but possible), or because they knew this is what would sell (especially in America and any other culture subscribing to the &#8220;American Dream&#8221;). The majority of people are not primarily concerning themselves with consciously waking up to their true nature. They are, however, deeply engrossed in the money-driven/orrientated mindset and &#8220;I am insufficient as I am&#8221; mindset that has been carefully impregnated into the human story for the last 400-600+ years by a tiny collective of people who presently reap the most benefit from a world that buys into these mindsets (i.e. the small handful of people who effectively own/possess/control a vast majority of the material wealth in this human world), at the expense of nearly every other nation/human being carrying interest bearing debt.</p>
<p>Stumbling around in the ridiculous seems to be human speciality. Of course, it&#8217;s all part of what helps Awareness evolve through the human experience.</p>
<p>With love,<br />
Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

I appreciate you stopping by and sharing your thoughts!

Yes, the movie was largely based on the book, and that is a good thing. Wallace D. Wattles knew what he was talking about.

However, I don&#039;t agree that the movie was capitalistic/materialistic. Yes, they used money and possessions to demonstrate the concept of the Law of Attraction, but that is simply because those are tangible, measurable things.

Explaining a concept to someone is very difficult if you have no way of showing them in real life how it works. It is my belief that one of the reasons why the Law of Attraction is so hotly debated is because so many people think that it is all about money and material possessions, and that, of course, is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I appreciate you stopping by and sharing your thoughts!</p>
<p>Yes, the movie was largely based on the book, and that is a good thing. Wallace D. Wattles knew what he was talking about.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t agree that the movie was capitalistic/materialistic. Yes, they used money and possessions to demonstrate the concept of the Law of Attraction, but that is simply because those are tangible, measurable things.</p>
<p>Explaining a concept to someone is very difficult if you have no way of showing them in real life how it works. It is my belief that one of the reasons why the Law of Attraction is so hotly debated is because so many people think that it is all about money and material possessions, and that, of course, is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Evatt</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Evatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 05:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-20</guid>
		<description>This is the book that The Secret was almost entirely based upon.

I read this book some years ago, and also watched TheSecret a few months ago. I think both fail to convey an important message with regards to the Law of Attraction. The Secret makes this omission far more severely than The Science Of Getting Rich -- what with being so incredibly capitalistic/materialistic in its approach (TheSecret that is).

Nice site by the way. Greatly enjoying reading through your blog entries. I&#039;ll be reading more just as soon as I have some spare time for it. Thanks.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the book that The Secret was almost entirely based upon.</p>
<p>I read this book some years ago, and also watched TheSecret a few months ago. I think both fail to convey an important message with regards to the Law of Attraction. The Secret makes this omission far more severely than The Science Of Getting Rich &#8212; what with being so incredibly capitalistic/materialistic in its approach (TheSecret that is).</p>
<p>Nice site by the way. Greatly enjoying reading through your blog entries. I&#8217;ll be reading more just as soon as I have some spare time for it. Thanks.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a great book. I love the &quot;Classics&quot; of success literature. One of my favorite new &quot;classics&quot; is Ben Stein&#039;s &quot;How successful People Win. I loved it. My review is here:

http://successbooks.blogspot.com/2006/10/success-book-review-how-successful.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great book. I love the &#8220;Classics&#8221; of success literature. One of my favorite new &#8220;classics&#8221; is Ben Stein&#8217;s &#8220;How successful People Win. I loved it. My review is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://successbooks.blogspot.com/2006/10/success-book-review-how-successful.html" rel="nofollow">http://successbooks.blogspot.com/2006/10/success-book-review-how-successful.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.todayisthatday.com/the-science-of-getting-rich/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://todayisthatday.com/blog/archives/24#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The full text is available here &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full text is available here <a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 27/34 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc
Object Caching 428/435 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.todayisthatday.com @ 2012-02-08 19:21:18 -->
